Wedding photographer extraordinaire Ryan Brenizer invented this really cool technique while on his honeymoon which is dubbed “The Brenizer Method”. For those who may or may not have heard of it and are not sure of what this technique is exactly, it’s essentially using a telephoto lens to create a very shallow depth of field as if shot with a wider angle lens. This technique makes a dSLR image look like it was shot by medium format.

Despite the directions Ryan posted here, followed by a very informative Facebook video and here’s a behind-the-scenes video also, there is still confusion amongst some people of how to do it and what you are achieving. Well, done correctly, you get this (photo copyrighted by Ryan Brenizer):

This is a result that can’t be achieved with a wide angle lens no matter how fast of an aperture. You can see more of the Brenizer Method here and by others on Flickr here.

So what is The Brenizer Method?

Essentially it is the same concept used by landscape photographers known as panorama stitching except instead of stitching a bunch of horizontal shots together to form a wide image, the images are horizontally and vertically stitched to create a wide and tall image not unlike a square. And because you are stitching together many files, you are creating a very high resolution image that can hold up to very large print sizes without loss in quality. By shooting at a very shallow depth-of-field (DOF) and then stitching the shots together, you’re exaggerating the shallow DOF.

In the image above, created from 47 images, Ryan used a Nikon AF 85mm f/1.4D shot at f/1.4. If you were to take the same image with the same 85mm at the distance he was standing, you would probably only get a half body shot of the couple with a background that looks like a wash of colors; which is fine if that is the look you are trying to achieve. If you stood back far enough to get the same framing as the image above, the people would appear very small in relation to their environment thus losing the intimate feel of the image above. That is one of the major drawbacks of a telephoto lens have more of a voyeuristic feel. That is one of the primary reasons photojournalists use a wide angle, to capture a sense of intimacy. If you used a wide angle lens to capture the same framing, you would achieve the intimacy, but lose the focus on the couple as the background would not exhibit the same bokeh as telephoto lens can.

Here is a sample of a shot I did. One shot, taken with the 85mm at f/1.2:

Bui Photography Brenzier Method Sample Photo with Canon EF 85mm f/1.2L II USM

It’s a nice shot, but a bit distant and detached. But what if we used the Brenzier Method? Here’s another sample picture with the same pose and distance with the same lens at the same aperture, but with 50 images stitched together:

Bui Photography Brenzier Method Sample Photo with Canon EF 85mm f/1.2L II USm

My Experience and How I Do It

In my experience, the results are best achieved by using a medium-telephoto lens (i.e. 85mm) with a very large aperture (i.e. f/1.4 or larger), of course that doesn’t mean you can’t use a wide angle (i.e. 16-35mm) or a zoom telephoto (i.e. 70-200mm) with an aperture of f/2.8. When I use The Brenizer Method, the Canon EF 85mm f/1.2L II USM is what I reach for. You also have to use the lens at the widest aperture as you are trying to take full advantage of shallow DOF, so I would have my aperture set to f/1.2 or f/1.4. Bare in mind, that your results may vary depending on whether you use a full-frame or a crop factor sensor.

Before getting started, there are some important things to remember that Ryan points out in his Facebook video for the Brenizer Method:

  • You must separate auto-focusing from your shutter button so that when pressed it is only locking exposure. The auto-focusing is then delegated to another button, usually the * button on the back of the camera. With newer bodies, they have a dedicated AF-On button that you can use. Nikon users will find they have a AE-L/AF-L (auto-exposure lock/auto-focus lock) button which you should use.
  • You must set a white balance. If you don’t, you’ll have a lot of pictures with varying white balances which will make the final image not look right. You can either do a custom white balance of the scene (easy, quick, and accurate), shoot in RAW & fix it later (a pain in the ass), or select a preset white balance (easy and quick, but not always accurate).
  • It does not matter if you shoot in RAW or JPEG, just keep in mind that if you shoot in RAW, it just means more processing time and larger files to deal with. I generally shoot in JPEG cause there is no major added advantage to shooting RAW for this technique.
  • If you choose to shoot JPEG, make sure you set the quality of your JPEG to the smallest setting. You’re not taking a single picture, but rather 20 or more and stitching them together so you don’t need to worry about quality on each of the shot as the final output will be a very high quality image. You could shoot at Large, but keep in mind that will exponentially increase processing time.

The steps to doing The Brenizer Method is rather simple once you get the hang of it, but it takes a bit of practice. This is what I commonly do, but YMMV:

  1. I determine the background I want to use and how I want to pose my subject. I make sure that my subject(s) are in a comfortable pose that they can hold for at least 30-seconds without moving; quite important as you do not want motion blur in your shot.
  2. I start by taking a reference shot to get an idea of how the shot roughly looks. This also lets me know if I need to stand back more or not by visualizing how much I want of the background.
  3. Right before I begin getting my shots, I generally take a random shot of something like the ground, my shoe, or anything just so you know where the beginning of your stitching images should take place. You’ll find this is very helpful when you extract your images. After I’m done, I usually take another one of these shots so I know where it stops.
  4. I then set my focus to the eyes (since I want the eyes in focus, you can set your focus to anything else), auto focus and begin snapping pictures of the entire subject(s) first making sure I get a lot of overlap. It is very important that you do not move where you are at or you will shift focus. It is also very important that you do not refocus as the focus is set to be on the eyes. After I’ve taken a number of overlapping pics of the subject(s), I begin getting shots of the background. Why we do the subject first is to ensure that we don’t get any motion blur as it can be difficult for the subject to hold the pose for too long. I’ve included a sample pic so you can get the idea:

    brenzier-method-overlay-sample-bui-photography

    The arrows are just for directional purposes. You’ll notice that I did not include any indication of when to take a shot because that is a personal preference, but you should overlap a lot and it’s always better to take more images than less. Hopefully the picture will give you a very good idea of how I do it.

  5. After I get back to the office, I extract all my images, except the ones for stitching, into Lightroom2. Rather, I download the images for stitching to my desktop into a folder I create to easy organize all the images.
  6. I then launch Adobe Photoshop CS3, I go to File > Automate > Photomerge…
  7. A new window should open, under Layout: Auto, Source Files Use: Files and make sure Blend images together is checked.
  8. Click Browse and select the first 25% of the images you took, select Open, and click OK. A mew window will open and start the merging process.
    • Note: you can try and select all the images, but unless you have a super powerful computer, Adobe Photoshop will crash. I’ve had this happen multiple times and finally figured out that if I split up the merges, it works quicker and without crashes.
    • You should try not to do anything else on the computer while the merging is taking place or it can crash the merge or you’ll find your computer running extremely slow.
  9. Once the merge completes, you should see a somewhat incomplete shot (that’s normal because you are only merging 25% of the total images at a time), save it as a PSD file and close it.brenzier-method-incomplete-sample-bui-photography
  10. Repeat Step 8 & 9 until all the images are complete and you have four PSD files (you might have more or less depending on how many batch of images you are merging at a time).
  11. Repeat Step 6 & 7, and click on Browse and select only the PSD files and click OK.
  12. Once that finishes, you should have a complete looking image. Crop as necessary and make any exposure corrections as needed.brenzier-method-complete-sample-bui-photography

So the final image size is quite large and capable of being cropped very liberally. Good luck and happy shooting!

2009-11-28 UPDATE: Here’s another really good tutorial by daifuku on how to do the Brenizer Method.

August 5, 2009 - 6:24 pm Sergey

Great explanation and the photo looks fantastic. I appreciate the detail behind the instruction and will try this out.

August 25, 2009 - 11:54 am Brenizer Method « Blog di Filippo Venturi

[...] The Brenizer Method Explained With Directions [...]

September 10, 2009 - 12:09 pm Método Brenizer: Panorámicas con Bokeh | jggWeb: Fotografía y Retoque Digital

[...] El Método Brenizer explicado por Richard Bui. [...]

September 12, 2009 - 8:58 pm Tribune of the Plebs » Blog Archive » The Brenizer Method

[...] feel confident that when I have a situation that this would work in I will be able to use it. This explanation by Richard Bui has a very good run down of what to do but the main points to note [...]

September 15, 2009 - 3:29 am Picture of the day (Part Deux) - Page 8 - Xbox 360 South African Community

[...] me. Here is a link to how you can shoot it. Very easy and you can achieve some stunning images. The Brenizer Method Explained With Directions | Bui Photography Flickr Group – Flickr: The Brenizer Method __________________ [...]

September 17, 2009 - 1:33 am Wayne

A very well written and easy to understand tutorial.
Looking forward to using this.
Thank you very much.

October 13, 2009 - 6:36 am James Thompson - New York Wedding Photographer

Thanks for the detailed and well organized explanation. I can not wait to give this method a spin.

October 17, 2009 - 11:35 am Sandra

I think it would have been easier to see the difference the method made if there were also a single wide-angle image to compare to the ’shopped one. Also the composite image looks more washed out than the single one above it.

October 30, 2009 - 10:54 am Nick

I’ve been doing this technique without realizing it was named after someone…

Don’t you get parralax error if you don’t use a tripod with adjusted nodal point? Ofcourse, you can mask in a single shot of the person if this were the case, but that wasn’t mentioned in the tutorial.

November 19, 2009 - 9:15 pm Richard Bui

Sorry for the delayed reply. I’ve never really noticed any issues with parallax, but one thing to be careful of is accidentally changing the distance of the camera to subject as you’ll end up with the subject out of focus.

December 13, 2009 - 9:18 pm The Brenizer Method - A medium format feel

[...] how this works, I asked Google to help me out. This is the best explanation I have found so far. The Brenizer Method Explained With Directions | Bui Photography I have to try this, just need to find the time . Thanks for starting this thread, very [...]

December 15, 2009 - 6:31 am Bridal: Kimberly » Jenna Cole Photography-Dallas, TX

[...] recently learned about a new photograhic technique called the “Brenizer  Method” and Kimberly was nice enough to let me test it out at her session. I still have a few things [...]

December 27, 2009 - 3:14 pm Mark

By far the best explanation I’ve found online – I’ve seen tens so far. Thank you very much.

I don’t own an FX body – I own a DX body with two primes – 35mm f/1.8 and 85mm f/1.8. Two quick questions:

1. What effect would DX body have on 85mm lens v. FX in terms of final result?
2. What would be the difference in results using 35mm f/1.8 v. 85mm f/1.8?

Thanks in advance,
Mark

December 27, 2009 - 5:45 pm Richard Bui

Mark: Thank you! As far as your questions:

1) Nothing major except for bokeh. It’s a long complicated explanation, but the concept is the same as the crop vs. full-frame argument.

2) Using telephoto lenses such an 85mm produces a different feel. It compresses the background and also creates a very flattering look for human subjects. With the Brenizer Method and a telephoto, you will get more bokeh than using a wide angle.

January 11, 2010 - 10:12 pm Happy Birthday Alex! {Phoenix Portrait Photographer} » Danielle Daigle Photography

[...] The next two photos I had the opportunity to try out the Brenizer Method (developed by Ryan Brenizer).  I’ve been wanting to try this technique for a while now, and this session had a few opportunities for me test it out.  Not too bad for a first try!  (For instructions on this technique, here’s a great tutorial by Richard Bui. [...]

January 22, 2010 - 11:15 pm The Brenizer Method Explained « Writings about Photography, Travel, Food & Tech • Sydney Low

[...] Brenizer Method Explained I was chatting to Sanchia about doing panoramas and remembered this technique from Ryan [...]

January 27, 2010 - 8:08 am Seno

This is one of the most helpful tutorial about brenizer method, thx :D

But i got some trouble when applying this method. I got very bad distortion on the edge of the stitched image. Is it because my lense (im using 50mm f1.4) ? my un-steady hand while taking the photo ? or the program i use (im using AutoStitch).

Thx :D

January 29, 2010 - 11:39 pm Daniel Buck

I don’t know if you can say he “invented” the technique, I’ve been doing this for years (since at least 2004, and probably earlier), I can’t say I invented it either, at the time I thought I was the only one doing it (since I came up with it on my own, and hadn’t seen anyone else do it) but I’m sure someone before me probably thought of it too. Maybe, brilliant minds think alike? :-)

February 2, 2010 - 4:02 pm Richard Bui

First, let me say this is my opinion. I think it’s a combination of many things like standing in one spot but shooting “around” might create lens distortion when stitching the images together. It also depends on how close you are to the subject. I think if you use a little long of a zoom, you won’t see it as bad.

February 2, 2010 - 4:02 pm Richard Bui

Great minds do think alike.

February 18, 2010 - 6:49 pm The Brenizer Method « This is the way

[...] Link 1Link 2 [...]